Reports and articles

Taliban Arms Management Practices
Research Florian Weigand Research Florian Weigand

Taliban Arms Management Practices

This paper argues that we should not see ‘political’ and ‘criminal’ groups as separate categories. Instead, we should envision a spectrum of motives and practices across all armed groups, regardless of how they are labelled.

Read More
Rethinking Armed Group Control
Research ashley jackson Research ashley jackson

Rethinking Armed Group Control

Prevailing understandings of control – which focus on territorial dividing lines and acts of violence – are incomplete. Our paper argues that armed group control should instead be broken down according to how armed groups seek to influence populations.

Read More
Beyond Greed: Why Armed Groups Tax
Research ashley jackson Research ashley jackson

Beyond Greed: Why Armed Groups Tax

Based on a review of armed group taxation practices, this journal article argues that armed group motives go beyond revenue. It explores explanations related to ideology, legitimacy, institution building, control of populations, and the performance of public authority.

Read More
Beyond Greed: Why Armed Groups Tax
Research ashley jackson Research ashley jackson

Beyond Greed: Why Armed Groups Tax

Surveying the existing literature, this ICTD Working Paper argues that a deeper understanding of armed group taxation, the motivations behind it, and the implications it has for an armed group’s relationship with civilian and diaspora populations, as well as the broader international community.

Read More
Taliban Narratives on Al Qaeda
Research ashley jackson Research ashley jackson

Taliban Narratives on Al Qaeda

Much has been written about the Taliban and Al Qaeda since 2001, but there is little consensus. Based on over 100 interviews with insurgent commanders and others, this report examines the Taliban’s strategic calculus for maintaining ties to Al Qaeda.

Read More
Regulating Irregular Actors: Can Due Diligence Checks Mitigate the Risks of Working with Non-state and Substate Forces?
Research ashley jackson Research ashley jackson

Regulating Irregular Actors: Can Due Diligence Checks Mitigate the Risks of Working with Non-state and Substate Forces?

Western states have frequently worked with non-state armed groups to confront security threats, as part of global counter-terrorism operations or as de facto security providers in stabilisation contexts. But this often presents substantial risks or drawbacks. This joint paper, published with GPPi, considers how the US tried to mitigate these risks while working with militias and substate forces in Afghanistan, Syria and Iraq.

Read More