Ashley Jackson
Ashley’s research and policy work broadly focus on armed groups, conflict, peacebuilding, political economy, humanitarianism and international aid. She began her career as an aid worker in southeast Asia and Afghanistan, with the Red Cross, Oxfam and the UN. She has written widely on negotiating with armed groups and advised various UN agencies, NGOs and governments on humanitarian access and conflict mediation.
She has written extensively on the conflict in Afghanistan and the Taliban. Her first book, Negotiating Survival: Civilian-Insurgent Relations in Afghanistan (Hurst/Oxford University Press, 2021), focuses on life under Taliban rule and the nature of civilian agency in wartime. She has also advised the UK Parliament, the US State Department and others on the Afghan war.
In addition to her academic and policy work, Ashley has written for Foreign Policy, the New York Times, Washington Post, Al Jazeera, Politico, and others. Ashley holds a PhD from the War Studies Department at King’s College London, an MSc in Gender and Development from the London School of Economics.
She is originally from New York, but currently resides in Nairobi.
In the news
Ashley Jackson comments on the latest developments in Afghanistan with regional tensions over resource management.
Ashley Jackson comments on the ban on female education in Afghanistan, and the turn toward female madrasas
The Centre’s Ashley Jackson, Florian Weigand and Leigh Mayhew write about what we get wrong about measuring wartime control, with Ibraheem Bahiss.
The Centre’s Ashley Jackson, Florian Weigand, and Leigh Mayhew write about the state of play with armed groups in the Sahel, with Laura Berlingozzi, Ed Stoddard and Ibraheem Bahiss
Ashley Jackson writes about how the Taliban’s taxation system helped it win the battle for control in Afghanistan.
Centre co-director Ashley Jackson featured on the Af/Pak File podcast, jointly hosted by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and the Wilson Center's Asia Program.
Centre analysis quoted in Economist coverage of the one year anniversary of the Taliban takeover.
Centre analysis quoted in Guardian coverage of the assassination in Kabul of Al Qaeda leader Ayman Zawahiri.
Centre analysis quoted in LA Times coverage of the assassination in Kabul of Al Qaeda leader Ayman Zawahiri.
Centre analysis quoted in Reuters coverage of the Taliban’s response to an earthquake in Afghanistan.
Featured work
Although the aid sector often treats corruption and diversion as an anomaly, they are pervasive, systemic and often unwittingly perpetuated by standard aid sector practices. Drawing primarily on evidence from Somalia and Afghanistan (with reference to other contexts), this paper explores the specific aid practices that enable and perpetuate corruption and diversion, and what donors and implementers should be doing differently.
Conflict-ridden and fragile countries are among the most vulnerable to climate change and least prepared to deal with it. They are largely excluded from climate adaptation programmes and funding. This article charts a path forward on how to address climate adaptation in conflict zones.
This paper examines climate change and armed groups, specifically the failure the address climate adaptation in areas beyond state control.
How Will the Israel-Hamas War Shape Armed Group Behavior and Engagement with Armed Groups?
Based on extensive research in Al-Shabab controlled areas of Somalia, this paper explores dynamics between Al-Shabab and those who live under their control.
This paper argues that we should not see ‘political’ and ‘criminal’ groups as separate categories. Instead, we should envision a spectrum of motives and practices across all armed groups, regardless of how they are labelled.
This paper argues that we should not see ‘political’ and ‘criminal’ groups as separate categories. Instead, we should envision a spectrum of motives and practices across all armed groups, regardless of how they are labelled.
This joint paper with ODI explores what we know (and what we don’t) about how ordinary people engage with armed groups.
Part of a larger research programme hosted by the Geneva Graduate Institute, this study examines the Taliban insurgency’s practice and attitudes toward IHL rules and human rights norms.
Prevailing understandings of control – which focus on territorial dividing lines and acts of violence – are incomplete. Our paper argues that armed group control should instead be broken down according to how armed groups seek to influence populations.
Based on a review of armed group taxation practices, this journal article argues that armed group motives go beyond revenue. It explores explanations related to ideology, legitimacy, institution building, control of populations, and the performance of public authority.
Much has been written about the Taliban and Al Qaeda since 2001, but there is little consensus. Based on over 100 interviews with insurgent commanders and others, this report examines the Taliban’s strategic calculus for maintaining ties to Al Qaeda.
Related events
Online Roundtable to discuss the future of Jihadism in Afghanistan, and its various interrelated ramifications, hosted by the LSE South Asia Centre.
Hosted by the Geneva Graduate Institute, this conference explored the findings of a multi-year study on armed group compliance with international humanitarian law and human rights norms.
King’s College London hosted an online event to discuss the Centre’s latest research on understanding armed group control.
Download the paper here.
The Centre co-hosted an event with the Royal Society of Asian Affairs and Aleph Strategies exploring the nature of engaging with armed groups in Afghanistan, Syria and elsewhere.
Watch a recording of the event online here.